Many folks in the arts who espouse left leaning politics seem to be on the run. Our most successful artists are paid for directly or indirectly by the one percent and further the call is out for artists to be entrepreneurs!!!!! That is to start a viable business and not expect hand outs from the state etc. (This stems indirectly from the change in grant making where grants are no longer given directly to artists but to the producers of art). On the other hand we know that collages and universities support some artists.
Naturally to have a viable business as an artist you are required to be commercial.
These days that means creating friendly, tonal, populist music.
Anyway what was my point?
Its that folks who present themselves as politically progressive, personally toe a different line in their artistic work and dealings.
anti-intellectual art? check
inoffensive art? check
art works that praise our leaders and famous folks? check
art celebrating diversity with narrow stereotypes? check
protest art with a narrow focus that almost everyone agrees with?
art that features incomprehensibility so it can be described as almost anything? check
Friendly art? Check
Using terms such as: avant-garde, cutting edge, innovative, taking a risk, revolutionary etc. to describe safe conservative art or imitation Americana from 50 years ago. check
artists who do as they are told or collaborate with who they are assigned? check
These days many claim that the artist is more important than their art. It follows then that its not about the best and the brightest, its about the most winning personality. Then its not about sustaining artistic success, its about how you "spin" your failures.
and that folks is politics.